Dear Democracy Now! Visitor: We are an independent, ad-free daily news program that serves millions of viewers and listeners each month. In this US election year, Democracy Now! is more important than ever. For 20 years, we’ve put a spotlight on corporate and government abuses of power. We lift up the stories of ordinary people working to make change in extraordinary times. We do all of this with just a fraction of the budget and staff of a commercial news show. We do it without ads, corporate sponsorship or government funding. How is this possible? Only with your support. A generous funder will match your donation dollar for dollar if you donate right now. That means when you give $10, your donation will be worth $20. Pretty exciting, right? So, if you've been waiting to make your contribution to Democracy Now!, today is your day. It takes just a couple of minutes to make sure that Democracy Now! is there for you every day.

Your Donation: $

U.S. Attack Plans for Iraq Are Modeled On Hiroshima and Nagasaki: A Discussion of "Shock and Awe"

March 21, 2003
Story
WATCH FULL SHOW

Shock and Awe. These are the words the Pentagon is using to describe its planned air campaign in Iraq.

Though the invasion has started and bombs are raining down on Baghdad, it appears the shock and awe part of the campaign hasn’t gotten underway.

The idea of "Shock and Awe" is to shatter Iraq "physically, emotionally and psychologically" by raining down on its people at least 300 missiles a day. That would mean that each day, Baghdad would be bombarded by more missiles than were launched during the entire 40 days of the 1991 Gulf War.

In January, when the plan was first leaked, a Pentagon official told the CBS News: "There will not be a safe place in Baghdad."

The plan was born several years ago, when seven former cold war warriors gathered to rethink US war strategy. The group was co-chaired by Harlan Ullman, a retired navy destroyer commander. In 1996, the group published its findings in a book called "Shock and Awe: Achieving Rapid Dominance."

Chapter one of the document reads: "Shutting the country down would entail both the physical destruction of appropriate infrastructure and the shutdown and control of the flow of all vital information and associated commerce so rapidly as to achieve a level of national shock akin to the effect that dropping nuclear weapons on Hiroshima and Nagasaki had on the Japanese."

Yesterday’s Christian Science Monitor reports author and co-chair Harlan Ullman is holding up the US nuclear bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki as a model. He said: "a society that was prepared to die was turned around."

Independent journalist Russell Mokhiber questions Ari Fleischer in a White House press briefing on Feb. 19th, 2003. He asks how it is possible to protect civilians under the "Shock and Awe" battle plan.

  • Jaime Havenar, independent researcher who wrote the first study of "Shock and Awe." The report is published on the Not In Our Name website.

Related link:

  • "":http://www.notinourname.net/Shock_and_Awe.html

The original content of this program is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Please attribute legal copies of this work to democracynow.org. Some of the work(s) that this program incorporates, however, may be separately licensed. For further information or additional permissions, contact us.