﻿WEBVTT

00:00:04.240 --> 00:00:07.210
AMY GOODMAN: This is Democracy
Now!, democracynow.org,

00:00:07.210 --> 00:00:09.730
The War and Peace Report.
I’m Amy Goodman.

00:00:09.730 --> 00:00:11.910
News that Dr. Christine
Blasey Ford

00:00:11.910 --> 00:00:15.640
will testify Thursday about her
sexual assault allegations

00:00:15.640 --> 00:00:17.320
against President
Trump’s Supreme Court

00:00:17.320 --> 00:00:19.020
nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh

00:00:19.550 --> 00:00:21.830
has prompted many
to warn senators

00:00:21.830 --> 00:00:23.550
not to repeat
the same mistakes

00:00:23.550 --> 00:00:25.150
made during
the confirmation process

00:00:25.150 --> 00:00:28.010
of Judge Clarence Thomas
in 1991,

00:00:28.010 --> 00:00:30.610
when Anita Hill was questioned
by an all-male,

00:00:30.610 --> 00:00:34.230
all-white Senate Judiciary
Committee about her allegations

00:00:34.230 --> 00:00:37.690
that Thomas sexually harassed
her when he was her supervisor.

00:00:37.690 --> 00:00:39.460
This is Anita Hill
being questioned

00:00:39.460 --> 00:00:41.930
by Republican Senator
Arlen Specter.

00:00:42.770 --> 00:00:44.820
SEN. ARLEN SPECTER: The New York
Times says this: quote,

00:00:44.820 --> 00:00:47.030
"In an interview,
Ms. Barry suggested

00:00:48.200 --> 00:00:50.030
that the allegations
were a result

00:00:50.030 --> 00:00:54.300
of Ms. Hill’s disappointment
and frustration that Mr. Thomas

00:00:54.300 --> 00:00:56.830
did not show
any sexual interest in her."

00:00:58.590 --> 00:01:00.550
Now, aside from saying
that Ms. Barry

00:01:01.990 --> 00:01:05.490
doesn’t know about you
on the social side,

00:01:07.110 --> 00:01:10.930
what about the substance
of what Ms. Barry had to say?

00:01:13.270 --> 00:01:14.980
ANITA HILL: What exactly are you
asking me?

00:01:16.520 --> 00:01:18.370
SEN. ARLEN SPECTER: Well,
I’ll repeat the question again.

00:01:19.540 --> 00:01:23.450
Was there any substance
in Ms. Barry’s flat statement

00:01:25.490 --> 00:01:26.760
that, quote,

00:01:26.760 --> 00:01:33.320
"Ms. Hill was disappointed
and frustrated that Mr. Thomas

00:01:33.320 --> 00:01:35.369
did not show
any sexual interest in her"?

00:01:38.610 --> 00:01:40.910
ANITA HILL: No, there is not.
There is no substance to that.

00:01:40.910 --> 00:01:43.050
He did show interest.

00:01:43.050 --> 00:01:45.820
AMY GOODMAN: In the weeks after
that hearing in 1991,

00:01:45.820 --> 00:01:48.820
black feminists organized
a manifesto titled

00:01:48.820 --> 00:01:51.400
"African American Women
in Defense of Ourselves"

00:01:51.400 --> 00:01:54.850
that was signed
by nearly 1,600 women

00:01:54.850 --> 00:02:00.170
who raised $50,000 to publish it
as an ad in The New York Times.

00:02:00.170 --> 00:02:02.300
It read in part,
"We are particularly outraged

00:02:02.300 --> 00:02:03.710
by the racist
and sexist treatment

00:02:03.710 --> 00:02:04.940
of Professor Anita Hill,

00:02:04.940 --> 00:02:07.310
an African American woman
who was maligned and castigated

00:02:07.310 --> 00:02:10.720
for daring to speak publicly
of her own experience

00:02:10.720 --> 00:02:12.080
of sexual abuse.

00:02:12.080 --> 00:02:14.180
The malicious defamation
of Professor Hill

00:02:14.180 --> 00:02:16.260
insulted all women
of African descent

00:02:16.260 --> 00:02:18.850
and sent a dangerous message
to any woman

00:02:18.850 --> 00:02:21.700
who might contemplate
a sexual harassment complaint."

00:02:22.230 --> 00:02:24.990
For more, we continue with
Part 2 of our conversation

00:02:24.990 --> 00:02:28.480
with Barbara Ransby in Chicago.
She was one of the initiators

00:02:28.480 --> 00:02:30.970
of "African American Women
in Defense of Ourselves"

00:02:30.970 --> 00:02:34.280
in 1991, now a professor
of African American studies,

00:02:34.280 --> 00:02:36.190
gender and women’s
studies and history

00:02:36.190 --> 00:02:38.430
at the University
of Illinois, Chicago,

00:02:38.430 --> 00:02:40.450
author of the award-winning
biography

00:02:40.450 --> 00:02:42.710
Ella Baker &amp;
the Black Freedom Movement

00:02:42.710 --> 00:02:46.840
and a new book, just out, titled
Making All Black Lives Matter:

00:02:46.840 --> 00:02:49.780
Reimagining Freedom
in the 21st Century.

00:02:49.780 --> 00:02:53.310
Thank you for continuing this
conversation, Professor Ransby.

00:02:53.310 --> 00:02:55.060
First I want to get
your response

00:02:55.060 --> 00:02:58.750
to Dr. Christine
Blasey Ford’s allegations,

00:02:58.750 --> 00:03:00.940
now Deborah
Ramirez’s allegations

00:03:00.940 --> 00:03:02.790
that just came out
in The New Yorker.

00:03:03.550 --> 00:03:05.770
Interestingly,
both of these women

00:03:06.330 --> 00:03:09.900
have spent their lives
working on trauma.

00:03:10.900 --> 00:03:14.070
Dr. Christine Blasey Ford
is at Palo Alto University.

00:03:14.070 --> 00:03:17.050
She’s a research psychologist,
and Stanford, she teaches.

00:03:17.050 --> 00:03:18.340
And Deborah Ramirez

00:03:18.340 --> 00:03:22.500
now works with domestic
violence survivors.

00:03:22.500 --> 00:03:26.850
Both alleging Brett Kavanaugh
sexually assaulted them,

00:03:26.850 --> 00:03:30.630
when he was 17
in the case of Ford and 18

00:03:30.630 --> 00:03:32.790
in the case of Ramirez.

00:03:32.790 --> 00:03:35.590
BARBARA RANSBY: Well,
the Ramirez allegations have,

00:03:36.330 --> 00:03:38.950
as you know, just come out.
And I’m not surprised,

00:03:38.950 --> 00:03:42.140
because often there
is a pattern of men

00:03:42.140 --> 00:03:45.040
who engage in this kind of
behavior, which there are many.

00:03:45.600 --> 00:03:47.090
And there are others
who participate

00:03:47.090 --> 00:03:48.670
in a kind of code of silence,

00:03:48.670 --> 00:03:51.710
who don’t think it’s
a serious transgression

00:03:51.710 --> 00:03:54.430
and who either watch
or hear about

00:03:54.430 --> 00:03:58.730
and don’t share
that information with others.

00:03:59.500 --> 00:04:02.380
But I’m not surprised that now
we have two people

00:04:02.380 --> 00:04:04.460
making these kinds
of allegations,

00:04:04.460 --> 00:04:08.070
and women who are sensitized
to a set of feminist issues,

00:04:08.070 --> 00:04:10.980
women who are sensitized
to the larger issue

00:04:10.980 --> 00:04:14.620
of sexual assault
and sexual violence,

00:04:14.620 --> 00:04:16.400
who had the courage
to come forward.

00:04:16.400 --> 00:04:20.410
I think that so many women
experience sexual harassment

00:04:20.410 --> 00:04:22.490
and sexual violence
on a continuum

00:04:23.050 --> 00:04:25.510
and choose to,
still to this day, in 2018,

00:04:26.330 --> 00:04:27.660
to keep quiet about it,

00:04:27.660 --> 00:04:31.150
because often the price
is very high for speaking out.

00:04:32.720 --> 00:04:36.070
AMY GOODMAN: I wanted to turn
to Joe Biden,

00:04:36.730 --> 00:04:38.770
who many may not realize

00:04:38.770 --> 00:04:43.200
that the Senate Judiciary
Committee of 1991,

00:04:43.200 --> 00:04:46.230
the Anita Hill hearing,
was Democratic.

00:04:46.230 --> 00:04:49.790
It was chaired by a Democrat,
yes, the former,

00:04:49.790 --> 00:04:52.030
well, now vice president—former
vice president,

00:04:52.030 --> 00:04:56.130
then Senate Judiciary chair,
Joe Biden,

00:04:56.130 --> 00:04:59.370
questioning Anita Hill
back in 1991.

00:05:00.540 --> 00:05:02.890
SEN. JOE BIDEN: Can you tell
the committee

00:05:02.890 --> 00:05:04.590
what was the most embarrassing

00:05:06.980 --> 00:05:09.670
of all the incidences
that you have alleged?

00:05:11.030 --> 00:05:13.700
ANITA HILL: I think the one
that was the most embarrassing

00:05:14.280 --> 00:05:19.900
was his discussion
of pornography

00:05:19.900 --> 00:05:24.420
involving these women
with large breasts

00:05:24.420 --> 00:05:28.940
and engaged
in a variety of sex

00:05:28.940 --> 00:05:31.600
with different people
or animals.

00:05:32.280 --> 00:05:35.790
That was the thing
that embarrassed me the most

00:05:35.790 --> 00:05:37.880
and made me feel
the most humiliated.

00:05:38.990 --> 00:05:41.010
AMY GOODMAN: Now I want to turn
to an interview

00:05:41.010 --> 00:05:43.050
with former senator,

00:05:43.050 --> 00:05:48.600
Vice President Joe Biden about
the Anita Hill hearings in 1991.

00:05:48.600 --> 00:05:51.000
This aired just Friday on NBC.

00:05:51.680 --> 00:05:55.960
Biden was questioned
by Craig Melvin.

00:05:57.040 --> 00:06:00.010
JOE BIDEN: Anita Hill was
vilified when she came forward

00:06:00.010 --> 00:06:02.510
by a lot of my colleagues.
Character assassination.

00:06:02.510 --> 00:06:05.220
I wish I could have done more
to prevent those questions

00:06:05.220 --> 00:06:06.980
and the way they asked them.

00:06:06.980 --> 00:06:09.310
I hope my colleagues
learned from that.

00:06:09.310 --> 00:06:10.510
... My biggest regret was,

00:06:10.510 --> 00:06:13.530
I didn’t know how I could shut
you off if you were a senator

00:06:13.530 --> 00:06:15.740
and you were attacking
Anita Hill’s character.

00:06:15.740 --> 00:06:17.710
Under the Senate rules,
I can’t gavel you down

00:06:17.710 --> 00:06:19.630
and say you can’t ask
that question.

00:06:19.630 --> 00:06:21.000
Although I tried.

00:06:21.000 --> 00:06:23.740
And so what happened
was she got victimized again

00:06:23.740 --> 00:06:25.000
during the process.

00:06:25.000 --> 00:06:27.540
CRAIG MELVIN: Seems like you
get it now, versus back in ’91.

00:06:27.540 --> 00:06:28.980
JOE BIDEN: Well, I think
I got it in '91.

00:06:28.980 --> 00:06:30.190
I don't think it—well,

00:06:30.190 --> 00:06:32.610
that—people
have their own opinion.

00:06:33.160 --> 00:06:36.300
AMY GOODMAN: OK, that’s
Joe Biden on Friday,

00:06:36.300 --> 00:06:40.070
saying he got it then.
Your response, as you go back,

00:06:40.070 --> 00:06:43.370
deeply involved with the Anita
Hill hearings, Professor Ransby?

00:06:44.120 --> 00:06:46.300
BARBARA RANSBY: Well, yeah,
I mean, I’m disappointed

00:06:46.300 --> 00:06:48.160
that he doesn’t think he could
have done anything else,

00:06:48.160 --> 00:06:50.680
because I think,
in any formal hearing,

00:06:50.680 --> 00:06:53.230
there are rules of engagement.
There’s protocol.

00:06:54.350 --> 00:06:56.900
Of course senators
are free to ask questions,

00:06:56.900 --> 00:07:00.180
but asking her
was she a woman scorned,

00:07:01.810 --> 00:07:05.690
implying in very snide ways
that she was lying

00:07:05.690 --> 00:07:07.050
and that she was unstable,

00:07:07.050 --> 00:07:12.140
that she had sexual desires
for Clarence Thomas

00:07:12.770 --> 00:07:15.130
and therefore was making
this up—so,

00:07:15.130 --> 00:07:18.820
I mean, all of that
should have been nixed,

00:07:18.820 --> 00:07:22.920
should have been checked
in the context of that hearing.

00:07:22.920 --> 00:07:26.760
And so I think however Joe Biden
might have done that,

00:07:26.760 --> 00:07:28.220
that’s what should
have happened,

00:07:28.220 --> 00:07:30.760
to have a fair
and respectful hearing.

00:07:30.760 --> 00:07:32.320
Anita Hill was there
with her family.

00:07:32.320 --> 00:07:34.710
She’s one of 13 siblings.

00:07:34.710 --> 00:07:38.050
Her aging mother, I believe,
was also in the audience.

00:07:38.050 --> 00:07:41.420
And she was challenged
to recount

00:07:41.420 --> 00:07:46.740
these really lewd
and raunchy statements

00:07:46.740 --> 00:07:51.470
by Clarence Thomas in the course
of making her case,

00:07:51.470 --> 00:07:55.010
and then being asked questions
to unsettle her,

00:07:57.030 --> 00:08:00.360
to make her feel humiliated
in that context.

00:08:00.890 --> 00:08:04.430
You know, it was just—I’m sure
more could have been done.

00:08:05.610 --> 00:08:07.450
The other thing is that
there were other witnesses

00:08:07.450 --> 00:08:09.470
that weren’t allowed to testify,

00:08:09.470 --> 00:08:13.500
so that was another omission
and error on Joe Biden’s part.

00:08:13.500 --> 00:08:16.610
Ultimately, 11 Democrats voted
to confirm Clarence Thomas

00:08:16.610 --> 00:08:18.710
despite these very compelling

00:08:18.710 --> 00:08:21.010
and disturbing allegations
about him.

00:08:21.010 --> 00:08:23.150
I mean,
Biden was not one of them,

00:08:23.150 --> 00:08:24.420
but there were 11 Democrats

00:08:24.420 --> 00:08:27.080
that voted to confirm
Clarence Thomas,

00:08:27.080 --> 00:08:31.190
who, as you know, was confirmed
by one of the narrowest margins

00:08:32.250 --> 00:08:33.600
since the 19th century.

00:08:33.600 --> 00:08:36.810
AMY GOODMAN: So, now talk more
about how you did

00:08:36.810 --> 00:08:40.610
what you did at the time,
how you organized in 1991—

00:08:40.610 --> 00:08:45.210
1,600 women,
African-American women,

00:08:45.210 --> 00:08:47.970
signed on to your letter—that
you raised enough money,

00:08:47.970 --> 00:08:51.300
$50,000, to get a full-page ad
in The New York Times,

00:08:51.300 --> 00:08:53.080
and why you felt
compelled to do this,

00:08:53.080 --> 00:08:55.230
and what you were doing,
Barbara, at the time.

00:08:55.230 --> 00:08:57.920
You weren’t a professor
of African American studies,

00:08:57.920 --> 00:08:59.850
gender and women’s
studies and history

00:08:59.850 --> 00:09:01.440
at University of Illinois.

00:09:01.440 --> 00:09:02.730
BARBARA RANSBY: Right.

00:09:02.730 --> 00:09:06.750
I was actually finishing
my dissertation on Ella Baker

00:09:06.750 --> 00:09:09.980
at the time.
I was teaching also in Chicago,

00:09:09.980 --> 00:09:12.330
but I wasn’t at University
of Illinois.

00:09:12.960 --> 00:09:14.170
But it was myself,

00:09:14.170 --> 00:09:16.570
it was Elsa Barkley Brown
and Deborah King.

00:09:16.570 --> 00:09:20.720
We were all three academics
who were watching this.

00:09:20.720 --> 00:09:22.030
I was also an organizer.

00:09:22.030 --> 00:09:25.210
I was very involved
in the anti-apartheid movement,

00:09:25.210 --> 00:09:27.960
very involved in black feminist
organizing efforts,

00:09:28.670 --> 00:09:30.620
very much involved
in progressive

00:09:30.620 --> 00:09:33.270
and left organizing
for a number of years.

00:09:33.270 --> 00:09:35.870
So organizing
was not unfamiliar to me.

00:09:36.820 --> 00:09:38.810
So, we felt that
it was important

00:09:38.810 --> 00:09:40.050
to have a collective voice

00:09:40.050 --> 00:09:43.930
and not just individual voices
in response to what we witnessed

00:09:43.930 --> 00:09:47.040
in the Anita
Hill-Clarence Thomas spectacle.

00:09:47.590 --> 00:09:50.210
We wanted particularly
black women to have a voice,

00:09:50.210 --> 00:09:52.110
because we didn’t hear
our voices heard.

00:09:52.110 --> 00:09:55.170
There was sort of
this false juxtaposition

00:09:55.170 --> 00:09:57.350
between race and gender.

00:09:57.890 --> 00:09:59.290
In fact, a number
of people said,

00:09:59.290 --> 00:10:00.920
"Well, it’s white women
who are coming forward

00:10:00.920 --> 00:10:03.040
to support Anita Hill,"

00:10:04.230 --> 00:10:06.390
which was not—you know,
I mean, white women did,

00:10:06.390 --> 00:10:08.170
black women did,
Latinx women did.

00:10:08.940 --> 00:10:10.700
But also Clarence Thomas
invoked this idea

00:10:10.700 --> 00:10:14.600
of a high-tech lynching,
which kind of gave him

00:10:14.600 --> 00:10:16.820
the mantle
of the black experience

00:10:16.820 --> 00:10:19.930
and completely invalidated
Anita Hill’s experience

00:10:19.930 --> 00:10:21.130
as a black woman

00:10:21.130 --> 00:10:24.050
who was experiencing
both sexism and racism.

00:10:24.050 --> 00:10:27.090
So we wanted to articulate
all of that in in our statement.

00:10:27.090 --> 00:10:30.540
We wanted to add some
complexity to the conversation.

00:10:31.060 --> 00:10:33.160
And we wanted it to be
in the public record.

00:10:33.160 --> 00:10:34.410
I have to say also,

00:10:34.410 --> 00:10:37.020
particularly galling
was a New York

00:10:37.020 --> 00:10:40.810
Times op-ed by professor
Orlando Patterson,

00:10:41.370 --> 00:10:43.810
who essentially said
that this is the way

00:10:43.810 --> 00:10:46.290
that black people interact
with each other,

00:10:46.290 --> 00:10:48.550
that Clarence Thomas didn’t
do anything wrong

00:10:48.550 --> 00:10:50.550
even if he said
some of these things,

00:10:50.550 --> 00:10:52.950
and that he should deny it
even if he did it,

00:10:52.950 --> 00:10:56.290
because he would be subject
to unfair

00:10:56.290 --> 00:10:58.850
and undue sanctions
and punishment.

00:10:58.850 --> 00:11:01.470
And so that was
particularly outrageous to us,

00:11:01.470 --> 00:11:04.860
that this would be put forward

00:11:04.860 --> 00:11:08.790
as a legitimate—as an acceptable
analysis of the black experience

00:11:08.790 --> 00:11:12.070
in such a big forum
as a New York Times op-ed.

00:11:12.070 --> 00:11:14.320
And so we wanted
to respond to that, as well.

00:11:15.330 --> 00:11:17.570
AMY GOODMAN: And what was
the response to your ad?

00:11:19.060 --> 00:11:21.940
BARBARA RANSBY: Well, we got
a great response

00:11:21.940 --> 00:11:23.730
when we made the call
for the ad.

00:11:23.730 --> 00:11:25.320
And again—I mentioned
before—it was

00:11:25.320 --> 00:11:26.530
before the internet,

00:11:26.530 --> 00:11:27.980
so when I tell this
to my students,

00:11:27.980 --> 00:11:30.329
they’re like, "How in the world
did you do it?"

00:11:30.860 --> 00:11:32.100
We called people.

00:11:32.100 --> 00:11:36.730
We emailed—I mean,
we weren’t using email.

00:11:36.730 --> 00:11:40.530
We called people.
We—word of mouth.

00:11:40.530 --> 00:11:45.240
We set up an 800 phone line.
We got letters.

00:11:45.240 --> 00:11:48.220
I still have shoeboxes with
letters and notes from people

00:11:48.220 --> 00:11:51.340
saying either—"This
happened to me.

00:11:51.340 --> 00:11:54.330
I completely believe her.
I’m completely outraged by this.

00:11:54.330 --> 00:11:56.930
Thank you for taking
this initiative."

00:11:56.930 --> 00:12:00.210
And so, it really resonated.
It really resonated.

00:12:00.210 --> 00:12:03.150
And after the fact, we heard
from people who were upset

00:12:03.150 --> 00:12:05.110
that they didn’t know
ahead of time

00:12:05.110 --> 00:12:07.040
in order to lend
their names to it.

00:12:07.040 --> 00:12:08.560
It was a lot
to raise money, too,

00:12:08.560 --> 00:12:11.140
and I’m pleased that
we were able to do it

00:12:12.200 --> 00:12:14.900
by very small donations
from many women

00:12:14.900 --> 00:12:17.950
and some men who contributed
to the campaign.

00:12:18.470 --> 00:12:20.100
AMY GOODMAN: So, I wanted
to bring this forward

00:12:20.100 --> 00:12:21.800
to what’s happening right now

00:12:23.390 --> 00:12:27.060
in the case of Dr. Christine
Blasey Ford.

00:12:27.060 --> 00:12:30.480
She’s set to testify Thursday,
but Dianne Feinstein,

00:12:30.480 --> 00:12:32.280
the Democratic senator,

00:12:33.200 --> 00:12:36.710
has called for a delay
in these hearings at this point,

00:12:36.710 --> 00:12:38.300
with another woman
stepping forward,

00:12:38.300 --> 00:12:42.340
and then Michael Avenatti saying
there may be another woman.

00:12:43.930 --> 00:12:48.050
And I wanted to ask you about
the difference in the times,

00:12:48.050 --> 00:12:51.320
what difference it makes
that this is all happening

00:12:51.320 --> 00:12:54.350
within the context
of the #MeToo movement

00:12:54.350 --> 00:12:56.770
and how this has grown,
which was begun

00:12:56.770 --> 00:12:59.630
by an African-American woman,
Tarana Burke.

00:13:00.210 --> 00:13:02.700
BARBARA RANSBY: Right. Well,
we hope this makes a difference.

00:13:02.700 --> 00:13:04.140
I mean, I think—you know,
as a historian,

00:13:04.140 --> 00:13:05.830
I study change over time, right?

00:13:05.830 --> 00:13:08.290
So there’s ways
in which things change,

00:13:08.290 --> 00:13:11.740
and then ways in which things
are all too familiar

00:13:12.250 --> 00:13:14.820
from 27 years ago.
But I do think

00:13:14.820 --> 00:13:18.030
the #MeToo movement has made
an important intervention.

00:13:18.030 --> 00:13:22.370
It has not only reiterated
and underscored

00:13:22.370 --> 00:13:25.870
the fact that sexual violence
and sexual harassment

00:13:25.870 --> 00:13:28.860
is pervasive in our society,

00:13:28.860 --> 00:13:33.480
but has made sure that men with
enormous power and privilege

00:13:33.480 --> 00:13:35.990
were not exempt,
were not insulated,

00:13:35.990 --> 00:13:40.660
were not protected
by their privilege and power.

00:13:40.660 --> 00:13:43.040
And so, when you have
a Harvey Weinstein,

00:13:43.040 --> 00:13:45.850
when you have the head
of media outlets

00:13:45.850 --> 00:13:49.430
who are called to be
accountable for their actions,

00:13:49.430 --> 00:13:51.470
I think that takes it
to another level.

00:13:51.470 --> 00:13:56.000
We also know that women
of color, working-class women,

00:13:56.000 --> 00:13:59.020
women who are incarcerated
are most vulnerable.

00:13:59.750 --> 00:14:01.610
Conversely, we know
that men of privilege,

00:14:01.610 --> 00:14:03.440
white men of privilege,

00:14:03.440 --> 00:14:05.600
are often not held accountable.
And so I think

00:14:05.600 --> 00:14:09.770
the #MeToo movement has crossed
a threshold in that regard,

00:14:09.770 --> 00:14:12.470
and we hope that that makes
a difference in this case.

00:14:13.730 --> 00:14:16.680
AMY GOODMAN: Dr. Ransby,
this brings us to your book,

00:14:17.260 --> 00:14:19.510
Making All Black Lives Matter:

00:14:19.510 --> 00:14:22.530
Reimagining Freedom
in the 21st Century.

00:14:24.530 --> 00:14:27.650
I asked Alexis Goldstein
earlier in the broadcast,

00:14:27.650 --> 00:14:30.450
who is organizing
the letter of 1,100 women

00:14:30.450 --> 00:14:35.150
who went to Holton-Arms,
Christine Blasey’s alma mater

00:14:35.150 --> 00:14:38.350
and high school—they
wrote a letter,

00:14:39.510 --> 00:14:41.590
and I asked her—you know,

00:14:41.590 --> 00:14:43.940
she was very involved
with Occupy Wall Street,

00:14:43.940 --> 00:14:47.470
and how that compares
to what’s happening with #MeToo.

00:14:47.470 --> 00:14:50.380
Let me ask you about this
all taking place in the midst

00:14:50.380 --> 00:14:52.820
of the Black Lives
Matter movement,

00:14:52.820 --> 00:14:57.250
also what’s happening
just in your city of Chicago.

00:14:57.250 --> 00:14:59.390
You have Jon Burge just died,

00:14:59.390 --> 00:15:01.250
who was the acknowledged
torturer,

00:15:01.250 --> 00:15:03.480
the police commander
responsible

00:15:03.480 --> 00:15:06.190
for so many young
African-American men

00:15:06.190 --> 00:15:12.300
being imprisoned
with false confessions

00:15:12.300 --> 00:15:13.680
after they were tortured.

00:15:13.680 --> 00:15:17.160
You have the Laquan McDonald
trial underway,

00:15:17.160 --> 00:15:19.560
not the trial of Laquan
McDonald—unfortunately,

00:15:19.560 --> 00:15:22.230
he’s dead—but
of the police officer,

00:15:22.230 --> 00:15:24.400
Jason Van Dyke,
who has been charged

00:15:24.400 --> 00:15:25.770
with first-degree murder.

00:15:25.770 --> 00:15:27.610
Talk about why
you wrote this book,

00:15:27.610 --> 00:15:29.740
and make whatever
connections you will.

00:15:31.040 --> 00:15:34.000
BARBARA RANSBY: Well,
the book documents

00:15:34.000 --> 00:15:36.950
the role of young
black feminists

00:15:36.950 --> 00:15:40.320
in the Movement for Black Lives,
the Black Lives Matter movement.

00:15:40.320 --> 00:15:44.260
And that was a really
important fact—right?—

00:15:44.260 --> 00:15:45.550
that sometimes
we gloss over,

00:15:45.550 --> 00:15:50.640
that from Ferguson to Chicago
to New York City to L.A.

00:15:50.640 --> 00:15:52.870
and Oakland, Baltimore,

00:15:52.870 --> 00:15:56.190
young women activists
with feminist sensibilities,

00:15:56.190 --> 00:15:58.540
influenced by earlier
feminist movements,

00:15:58.540 --> 00:16:01.170
from "African American Women
in Defense of Ourselves"

00:16:01.170 --> 00:16:04.110
to the Combahee River Collective
to the abolitionist work

00:16:04.110 --> 00:16:07.710
of Angela Davis and Critical
Resistance—those young women

00:16:07.710 --> 00:16:10.430
were at the very forefront
of the movement

00:16:10.430 --> 00:16:12.550
against state violence,

00:16:12.550 --> 00:16:16.370
rallying, in the case of Michael
Brown’s murder in Ferguson,

00:16:16.370 --> 00:16:19.990
but also holding up in the
"Say Her Name" campaign,

00:16:19.990 --> 00:16:23.900
holding up the deaths
of African-American women

00:16:24.410 --> 00:16:26.300
by various forms
of violence,

00:16:26.300 --> 00:16:29.620
but state violence—the death
in custody of Sandra Bland,

00:16:29.620 --> 00:16:32.280
the police shooting
of Rekia Boyd.

00:16:32.280 --> 00:16:34.880
And I wanted to talk about
how black feminist politics,

00:16:34.880 --> 00:16:36.710
which are intersectional,

00:16:36.710 --> 00:16:40.370
which look at multiple forms
of oppression and injustice

00:16:40.370 --> 00:16:42.450
and the way that they feed
off of each other,

00:16:42.450 --> 00:16:45.070
why those politics
were so pronounced,

00:16:45.070 --> 00:16:49.170
and why that fact
was so important in sustaining

00:16:49.170 --> 00:16:52.300
the Black Lives Matter movement
or the larger rubric,

00:16:52.300 --> 00:16:54.060
the Movement for Black Lives.

00:16:54.060 --> 00:16:56.460
And that particularly
is relevant in Chicago.

00:16:57.220 --> 00:16:59.370
In Chicago, we have
a range of organizations,

00:16:59.370 --> 00:17:02.880
from Black Youth Project 100
to Assata’s Daughters

00:17:02.880 --> 00:17:07.470
to Black Lives Matter Chicago,
who have been really relentless

00:17:07.470 --> 00:17:11.010
in challenging
the Chicago Police Department

00:17:11.010 --> 00:17:14.420
around various
instances of violence,

00:17:14.420 --> 00:17:16.980
Laquan McDonald being
only one of those,

00:17:17.650 --> 00:17:22.820
and have been mainstays
at this Jason Van Dyke trial.

00:17:23.710 --> 00:17:27.580
So, Chicago and the organizing
that’s gone on here

00:17:27.580 --> 00:17:30.640
has been at the epicenter
of the Movement for Black Lives

00:17:30.640 --> 00:17:32.540
and continues to be.

00:17:32.540 --> 00:17:34.440
You mentioned Jon Burge’s
passing.

00:17:35.110 --> 00:17:37.850
The campaign here in Chicago

00:17:37.850 --> 00:17:41.500
to get accountability
for police torture

00:17:41.500 --> 00:17:45.550
that had a long history here
under Jon Burge

00:17:45.550 --> 00:17:47.210
went on for many, many years.

00:17:47.210 --> 00:17:49.550
Several of his victims
ended up on death row.

00:17:49.550 --> 00:17:53.520
There was a campaign
to get all of them released,

00:17:53.520 --> 00:17:55.690
and most—all of them
were released,

00:17:56.530 --> 00:17:59.660
and then a campaign
for a city ordinance

00:17:59.660 --> 00:18:04.380
that would give some
sort of compensation to victims

00:18:04.380 --> 00:18:08.250
who didn’t have that because
of statute of limitations,

00:18:08.250 --> 00:18:11.150
but also set up a curriculum
in the Chicago Public Schools

00:18:11.660 --> 00:18:14.150
and set up a center
for people dealing with trauma

00:18:14.150 --> 00:18:16.940
from police violence.
So, there have been victories.

00:18:16.940 --> 00:18:19.910
There’s been sustained
organizing here in Chicago.

00:18:19.910 --> 00:18:23.250
We have a historic mayoral race
coming up next year,

00:18:23.250 --> 00:18:25.820
and these issues are fitting
prominently in that.

00:18:26.370 --> 00:18:27.800
And the young women
who have been a part

00:18:27.800 --> 00:18:29.340
of the Black Lives
Matter movement

00:18:29.340 --> 00:18:31.720
will fit prominently
in that campaign, as well.

00:18:32.380 --> 00:18:33.960
AMY GOODMAN: And now you have
Rahm Emanuel

00:18:33.960 --> 00:18:35.610
announcing he will not
run for mayor again.

00:18:35.610 --> 00:18:36.840
BARBARA RANSBY: Exactly.

00:18:36.840 --> 00:18:38.080
AMY GOODMAN: Rahm Emanuel,

00:18:38.080 --> 00:18:40.810
who became mayor again
in the last election

00:18:40.810 --> 00:18:44.610
after suppressing—after
information was suppressed:

00:18:44.610 --> 00:18:47.350
the videotape of what
happened to Laquan McDonald.

00:18:48.510 --> 00:18:49.770
BARBARA RANSBY: Yeah,
absolutely.

00:18:49.770 --> 00:18:52.340
And that’s changed
the landscape.

00:18:52.340 --> 00:18:54.530
We also have several
African-American women

00:18:55.220 --> 00:18:58.720
running for mayor
in this current round.

00:18:58.720 --> 00:19:02.990
So, it was interesting and,
I think, not inconsequential

00:19:02.990 --> 00:19:05.170
that Rahm Emanuel
made his announcement

00:19:05.170 --> 00:19:07.600
that he wasn’t going to run
for re-election

00:19:07.600 --> 00:19:10.700
just as
the Jason Van Dyke trial,

00:19:10.700 --> 00:19:13.330
jury selection,
was getting underway.

00:19:13.330 --> 00:19:16.130
That case was going to haunt him
in this campaign,

00:19:16.130 --> 00:19:17.430
and I think he knew it.

00:19:17.430 --> 00:19:20.430
And so I think the movement
here in Chicago

00:19:20.430 --> 00:19:23.780
that has kept
the Laquan McDonald case alive,

00:19:23.780 --> 00:19:26.140
that has said this young
man’s life did matter,

00:19:26.730 --> 00:19:28.940
that someone will be
held accountable,

00:19:28.940 --> 00:19:31.260
the person that killed him
will stand trial,

00:19:31.950 --> 00:19:35.270
that all of that is really
important in understanding

00:19:35.270 --> 00:19:38.540
the current political context
and the current mayoral race

00:19:38.540 --> 00:19:40.690
that is unfolding here
in Chicago.

00:19:42.480 --> 00:19:45.220
AMY GOODMAN: Any final thoughts
as we wrap up,

00:19:45.220 --> 00:19:48.810
this moment
we’ve come to right now?

00:19:48.810 --> 00:19:52.580
I mean, you have Anita Hill
weighing in at this point.

00:19:52.580 --> 00:19:55.270
This isn’t like a moment
way back in history.

00:19:56.300 --> 00:19:58.349
You have the Black
Lives Matter movement.

00:19:58.870 --> 00:20:00.890
You have the #MeToo movement.

00:20:00.890 --> 00:20:05.380
As a historian, do you think
we are making positive change

00:20:05.380 --> 00:20:08.700
in this country,
that there is a trajectory,

00:20:08.700 --> 00:20:11.940
if you will,
a moral arc towards justice?

00:20:12.820 --> 00:20:14.090
BARBARA RANSBY: Well,
I do think so.

00:20:14.090 --> 00:20:16.920
I mean, I think the best
of times, the worst of times.

00:20:16.920 --> 00:20:19.440
I mean, many of us
have felt traumatized

00:20:19.440 --> 00:20:22.850
by this current occupant
of the White House,

00:20:22.850 --> 00:20:25.680
because day after day
there’s a new outrage.

00:20:25.680 --> 00:20:28.410
But it’s not just the
recklessness of his behavior,

00:20:28.410 --> 00:20:31.180
it’s also the policies
that are being pushed through,

00:20:31.840 --> 00:20:34.690
the programs
that are being dismantled,

00:20:34.690 --> 00:20:38.130
the tax bill
which was horrendous, etc.

00:20:38.130 --> 00:20:40.160
But we’ve also seen more
organizing,

00:20:40.160 --> 00:20:42.140
sustained organizing,

00:20:42.140 --> 00:20:45.430
direct action organizing,
new coalitions forming.

00:20:45.430 --> 00:20:47.220
We’ve seen more of that
than ever before.

00:20:47.220 --> 00:20:51.940
We see a whole crew
of new progressive candidates

00:20:51.940 --> 00:20:53.890
coming into
the electoral arena.

00:20:53.890 --> 00:20:56.570
So I’m very optimistic.
I work very closely

00:20:56.570 --> 00:21:00.610
with a lot of young organizers
here in Chicago and nationally.

00:21:00.610 --> 00:21:02.730
They are smart,
they are committed,

00:21:02.730 --> 00:21:04.580
and they’re passionate

00:21:04.580 --> 00:21:06.770
about creating a different
kind of country

00:21:06.770 --> 00:21:08.640
and building the movement
that will get us there.

00:21:08.640 --> 00:21:10.880
And I’m hopeful
that that will be the case.

00:21:10.880 --> 00:21:12.140
AMY GOODMAN: Barbara Ransby,

00:21:12.140 --> 00:21:14.090
professor of
African American studies,

00:21:14.090 --> 00:21:15.970
gender and women’s
studies and history

00:21:15.970 --> 00:21:18.170
at the University
of Illinois, Chicago.

00:21:18.170 --> 00:21:20.590
In 1991, she was one
of the initiators

00:21:20.590 --> 00:21:23.600
of the "African American Women
in Defense of Ourselves,"

00:21:23.600 --> 00:21:26.800
a black feminist ad campaign
in support of Anita Hill.

00:21:26.800 --> 00:21:29.710
They got a full-page ad
in The New York Times

00:21:29.710 --> 00:21:32.880
supporting Anita Hill in her
sexual harassment allegations

00:21:32.880 --> 00:21:35.390
against then-Supreme Court
nominee Clarence Thomas,

00:21:35.390 --> 00:21:37.700
who would be confirmed
to the Supreme Court.

00:21:38.450 --> 00:21:40.640
Professor Ransby is out
with a new book.

00:21:40.640 --> 00:21:42.870
It’s called Making
All Black Lives Matter:

00:21:42.870 --> 00:21:45.770
Reimagining Freedom
in the 21st Century.

00:21:45.770 --> 00:21:49.590
To see Part 1 of our discussion,
you can go to democracynow.org.

00:21:49.590 --> 00:21:51.939
I’m Amy Goodman.
Thanks so much for joining us.

