Debate on House Counter-Terrorism Bill

StoryMarch 20, 1996
Watch iconWatch Full Show

Jimmy Landano

Incarcerated wrongly incarcerated for killing a police officer

Leslie Hagin

Legislative Director of National Association of Criminal Defence Lawyers

Bud Welch

Father of a victim of Oklahoma City bombing

Nick Guess

Director of Intergovernmental Relations, Justice Dept.

The counter-terrorism bill passed in the House yesterday is called weak by Clinton after a bipartisan coalition voted to remove clauses in the bill they believed would have given federal law enforcement agencies too much power. However, it weakens the access of convicted citizens to Habeas Corpus. Guests Landano and Hagin argue about the importance of the right to Habeas Corpus, both in Mr. Landano’s personal case, and for the entire criminal justice system. Mr. Welch argues that the bill deals with many issues tangential to security, but does not provide the necessary funds to law enforcement agencies to actually prevent acts of terrorism. Mr. Gess defends the bill by claiming it only raises the standard for Habeas Corpus, without making it unattainable.

Segment Subjects (keywords for the segment): Counter-terrorism Bill, Habeas Corpus, Oklahoma City Bombing

NEXTChris Hedges vs. Eddie Glaude: Should Progressives Vote for Hillary Clinton or Jill Stein?
The original content of this program is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Please attribute legal copies of this work to Some of the work(s) that this program incorporates, however, may be separately licensed. For further information or additional permissions, contact us.

Non-commercial news needs your support

We rely on contributions from our viewers and listeners to do our work.
Please do your part today.

Make a donation