When a political party takes out negative advertising targeting a candidate, should those ads be subject to campaign spending limits? This was the questions before the U.S. Supreme Court yesterday in a case involving in the Republican Party of Colorado versus the Federal Election Commission or FEC, a case which some say puts campaign finance laws at odds with the First Amendment. Groups like Common Cause and Public Citizen filed amicus briefs on behalf of the FEC, while the ACLU both the Republican and Democratic National Committees support the Colorado GOP’s case. Here to explain, and debate this case are: Lisa Rosenberg, an attorney with the Center for Responsive Politics FEC Watch Project.
< Previous Story | Next Story >
Tuesday, April 16, 1996 Whole Show
< Previous Story | Next Story >
Recent ShowsMore Shows
Stories
Headlines
- Palestinian Prisoners Approve Deal to End Hunger Strike
- Palestinians Mark "Nakba" with Day of Protest
- Colorado Lawmakers Nix Same-Sex Union Bill
- Obama Delivers Commencement Address to Women Graduates
- Report: NATO Failed to Fully Investigate Civilian Deaths in Libya Bombing
- Head of Anti-Whaling Group Sea Shepherd Arrested in Germany for 2002 Confrontation
- Malaysian Tribunal Finds Bush, Cheney Guilty of War Crimes
- California Governor Unveils Cuts, Tax Hikes to Overcome Budget Shortfall
- Democrats Accept Corporate Funds for Convention
- Activists Protest Resumption of Controversial Immigration Policy in New York
The original content of this program is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Please attribute legal copies of this work to democracynow.org
. Some of the work(s) that this program incorporates, however, may be separately licensed. For further information or additional permissions,
contact us.
Columns
By Amy Goodman with Denis Moynihan
Shareholder meetings can be routine, unless you are Bank of America, in which case it may be declared an "extraordinary event." That is what the city of Charlotte, North Carolina called the bank’s shareholder meeting this week. Bank of America is currently the second largest bank in the US (after JP Morgan Chase), claiming more than $2 trillion in assets. It is also the "too big to fail" poster child of Occupy Wall Street, a speculative banking monstrosity that profits from, among other things, the ongoing foreclosure crisis and the exploitation of dirty coal.
Web Exclusives
In an extended interview, David Bronner, president of Dr. Bronner’s Magic Soaps, discusses the history of the company, why they put sustainability and social justice ahead of profits, the organic and GMO labeling movements, the U.S. war on hemp, and why they refuse to sell out.
Human Rights Watch’s Kenneth Roth examines why the U.S. has not pressured Bahrain to release pro-democracy activists. He also discusses Syria and the conditions in Israeli jails and courts that prompted 1,550 Palestinian prisoners to go on a hunger strike. [includes rush transcript]
