You turn to us for voices you won't hear anywhere else.

Sign up for Democracy Now!'s Daily Digest to get our latest headlines and stories delivered to your inbox every day.

Are Grand Juries Not So Grand?

Listen
Media Options
Listen

Related

    As the seemingly endless probe of President Clinton continues, criticism of independent prosecutor Kenneth Starr has grown. The White House has suggested, with some Republicans on Capitol Hill agreeing, that Starr’s own personal zealotry has led to an investigation that is spiraling out of control. While Starr is an aggressive prosecutor, and perhaps a politically motivated one as well, he is hardly the first to misuse a grand jury as a political instrument.

    The grand jury began as a shield to protect the accused. Has it turned into a sword against the very people it was intended to protect?

    Guest:

    • Margaret Ratner is an attorney. She was the head of the Grand Jury Project beginning in the late 1970s. She is one of the authors of the treatise “Representing Witnesses Before Federal Grand Juries.”
    • Roger Wareham, attorney for the December 12 movement. As one of the New York 8, he was charged with conspiracy (under RICO) to commit armored car robberies, and to break people out of prison. He was acquitted of RICO and convicted of arms possession. The Grand Jury lasted for 9 months.

    Related Story

    StoryApr 24, 2024Naomi Klein: Jews Must Raise Their Voices for Palestine, Oppose the “False Idol of Zionism”
    The original content of this program is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Please attribute legal copies of this work to democracynow.org. Some of the work(s) that this program incorporates, however, may be separately licensed. For further information or additional permissions, contact us.

    Non-commercial news needs your support

    We rely on contributions from our viewers and listeners to do our work.
    Please do your part today.
    Make a donation
    Top