Hello! You are part of a community of millions who seek out Democracy Now! for ad-free daily news you can trust. Maybe you come for our daily headlines. Maybe you come for our in-depth stories that expose corporate and government abuses of power and lift up the voices of ordinary people working to make change in extraordinary times. We produce all of this news at a fraction of the budget of a commercial news operation. We do this without ads, government funding or corporate sponsorship. How? This model of news depends on support from viewers and listeners like you. Today, less than 1% of our visitors support Democracy Now! with a donation each year. If even 3% of our website visitors donated just $12 per month, we could cover our basic operating expenses for a year. Pretty amazing right? If you visit us daily or weekly or even just once a month, now is a great time to make a monthly contribution.

Your Donation: $
Monday, January 15, 2001 FULL SHOW | HEADLINES | NEXT: Putting the Race in Election Races: Voter...

Ny Court Rules to End Racial and Economic Injustice in Public Education

download:   Audio Get CD/DVD More Formats
This is viewer supported news

A New York State Supreme Court judge last week declared that the state’s method of financing public schools isillegal. Judge Leland Degrasse wrote that the spending formula deprives New York City students of a sound, basiceducation’ guaranteed by the state’s constitution. And by disproportionately hurting minority students, the systemviolates federal civil rights laws.

The current formula provides New York City students with $2,000 less than those in Buffalo, Rochester, Syracuse andYonkers. More than 70% of the state’s minority children and 60% of the state’s poor children go to school in thecity. 30% of NY city students never graduate from high school.

New York’s ruling is not unique: some 20 states across the nation have already faced similar rulings.

In Kentucky, a court deemed the state’s method of public school finance unconstitutional in 1989. The state respondedby establishing minimum levels of discretionary spending in each district, and has since been hailed as a model ofsuccessful public school reform. Other states have fared less well. New Jersey’s courts have repeatedly foundefforts to achieve parity between poor and rich districts insufficient.

Clearly, a forceful court ruling by itself will not secure racial and economic justice in public education. On thisMartin Luther King day, we will look not only at how New York’s Campaign for Fiscal Equity won its case, but also thechallenges ahead, across the nation.


  • Robert And Sumaya Jackson, member of the Community School Board 6 and chair of the Campaign for FiscalEquality. Sumaya was a plaintiff in the lawsuit and was in the 1st grade at PSI 187 when the suit was filed in 1993.
  • Michael Rebell, Executive Director of the Campaign for Fiscal Equity and lead attorney in the case.
  • Bonnie Marshall, Coordinator of Education Initiatives, Jefferson County Public Schools in Kentucky;Director of Program Development, Kentucky Alliance of Black Educators; educator for 31 years.
  • Rosco Brown, Director, Center for Urban Education Policy at City University of New York graduate center;member of the board of the Campaign for Fiscal Equity; co-chair, Emergency Coalition Against Vouchers.

Creative Commons License The original content of this program is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Please attribute legal copies of this work to democracynow.org. Some of the work(s) that this program incorporates, however, may be separately licensed. For further information or additional permissions, contact us.

This is viewer supported news