Modal close

Dear Democracy Now! visitor,

You turn to Democracy Now! for ad-free news you can trust. Maybe you come for our daily headlines. Maybe you come for in-depth stories that expose corporate and government abuses of power. Democracy Now! brings you crucial reporting like our coverage from the front lines of the standoff at Standing Rock or news about the movements fighting for peace, racial and economic justice, immigrant rights and LGBTQ equality. We produce our daily news hour at a fraction of the budget of a commercial news operation—all without ads, government funding or corporate sponsorship. How is this possible? Only with your support. Right now, a generous funder will match your donation dollar for dollar. That means when you give $10 to Democracy Now!, we'll receive $20. So, if you've been waiting to make your contribution to Democracy Now!, today is your day. It takes just a couple of minutes to make sure that Democracy Now! is there for you and everybody else in 2017.

Non-commercial news needs your support.

We rely on contributions from you, our viewers and listeners to do our work. If you visit us daily or weekly or even just once a month, now is a great time to make your monthly contribution.

Please do your part today.

Topics

"1775: A Good Year for Revolution" -- Author Kevin Phillips on the Origin of American Independence

1775 use

    We interview political and economic author Kevin Phillips Wednesday about his new book, 1775: A Good Year for Revolution, which follows "a United States taking shape rather than losing headway." Phillips argues 1775–not 1776–is the more important year of the American Revolution. Read an excerpt from the book below, and click here to see a past interview with Phillips on Democracy Now!

    You can send us question suggestions to ask Phillips. Email us at stories at democracynow.org with "Kevin Phillips" in the subject line or share on our Facebook page. Tweet to @democracynow #DNlive.

    Reprinted by arrangement with Viking, a member of Penguin Group (USA) Inc., from 1775 Copyright © Kevin Phillips, 2012

    Excerpt of Chapter 1, The Spirit of 1775

    Such was the arousal and spirit of 1775 that rage militaire— a patriotic
    furor, a passion for arms— swept the thirteen colonies that spring and
    summer, giving the American Revolution its martial assurance and
    its vital, if somewhat delusionary, early momentum. Great hopes took hold,
    and sedentary lawyers, publishers, and preachers pored over their libraries
    of English political and revolutionary precedents.

    Lexington and Concord and Bunker Hill sowed confidence, and by summer,
    scarlet- coated military might had shrunk back to encircled Boston and
    a few fast- deserting companies in New York. Following these initial successes,
    Patriots soon developed “a national conceit of born courage in combat with
    a sudden acclaim for a superior form of military discipline, easily acquired”—
    that of a valorous and virtuous citizen soldiery. It was all very heady.

    Virtue, the old Roman credo, clad itself in a uniquely American garb.
    Hunting shirts, belts, and leggings became fashionable, what a later era
    might term militia chic. Even gentry- minded Virginians cast aside their
    imported velours and joined in. Before the opening of a June 1775 legislative
    session in Williamsburg, burgesses were recommended to attend in
    shirtmen’s garb— frontier- type apparel— “which best suits the times, as the
    cheapest and the most martial.” And “numbers of the Burgesses” did indeed
    come wearing “coarse linnen or canvas over their Cloaths and a Tomahawk
    by their Sides.” New Englanders, informed by Harvard and Yale scholars,
    boasted that no plausible European army could be large enough to overcome
    the combination of American space and just cause. In Pennsylvania,
    even erstwhile pacifist Quakers marched in a volunteer light infantry company
    nicknamed the “Quaker Blues,” for which some were quickly read out
    of their monthly meetings.

    Three thousand miles away, many British policy makers suffered from
    an opposite “empire militant” style of conceit. No colonial riff raff could
    hope to stand up to the professional armies of the world’s preeminent imperium.
    The revolutionaries would scatter in panic after two or three of
    their well- known leaders were hung as traitors. General James Grant told
    amused listeners that he could march from one end of the American colonies
    to the other with 5,000 British regulars. The king’s aide- de- camp, General
    Thomas Clark, thought he could do it with 1,000 men, gelding
    colonial males as he went.3 Boston radicals, “Oliverian” at heart, were the
    trouble spreaders, subverting loyal and unwary subjects elsewhere. Through
    much of 1774 and 1775, even as British ministers transferred troops to hostile
    Boston, they naïvely emptied barracks elsewhere.

    Clearly both sides misread some military and political realities. However,
    the rebels of 1775 had the better reason for confidence. Provincial boundaries
    of that era being imprecise, disputed, or vague, no researcher can hope to
    calculate the ratio of the thirteen- colony domain— from Maine (then a district
    of Massachusetts) south through Georgia— still effectively occupied by
    British soldiers or administered by functioning officials of His Majesty’s
    government at year’s end. Whatever the maps in Whitehall or St. James purported
    to show, the reality on the ground was stark: practically nothing.

    Consider: in Virginia and both Carolinas, the summer of 1775 saw
    Crown- appointed governors ignominiously flee their unfriendly capitals for
    cramped but seizure- proof accommodations on nearby British warships. In
    February 1776, the governor of Georgia, all but powerless, finally decamped
    to a convenient frigate. In most places, the king’s writ no longer ran. In all
    four southern colonies, Patriot- led provincial congresses and committees of
    safety had taken extralegal but effective control of government. Forts had
    been captured, munitions seized, sea actions fought, towns burned, and
    regiment after regiment mustered into the new Continental Army.

    An ocean away, the punitive intentions of King George III also kept
    growing— from his late- 1774 comment about looking forward to putting
    down rebellion in Massachusetts to his mid- 1775 hope of hiring Russian
    mercenaries, only to settle by year end for Hessians and Brunswickers.
    Henry Howard, twelfth Earl of Suffolk and a principal secretary of
    state, had agreed that the Russians would make “charming visitors at
    New- Yorke, and civilize that part of America wonderfully.” A year before
    July 4, 1776, the die was all but cast. In fact, participants from King George
    to John Adams used precisely that phrase, first employed by Julius Caesar
    when he crossed the Rubicon in 49 b.c.

    The reader can learn about these events and escalations in the history
    books, just not conveniently or in very much detail. Over two centuries, as
    the Revolutionary War became all but sanctified as “the single most important
    source for our national sense of tradition,” public attention was diverted
    from the struggle’s more complicated, less- inspiring realities.

    Disregarding the necessities of munitions smuggling and using militiamen
    to suppress political dissidence, the origins of the republic became ever
    more romanticized around the assertion of 1776 as a moral and ideological
    watershed not just for North America but for the world. Events were also
    confected into neat celebratory symbols like Paul Revere’s ride, George
    Washington’s greatness, Benjamin Franklin’s genius, Thomas Jefferson’s
    Declaration of Independence, Betsy Ross’s flag, and the seriously misrepresented
    Liberty Bell. Boston, Lexington- Concord, Philadelphia, and Valley
    Forge became the hallowed venues, with legend- building side excursions to
    Mount Vernon and Monticello. This adulation has served to minimize
    comprehension of what actually happened— not least how a rage militaire
    helped put down deep enough early foundations for American nationhood
    to withstand the disillusionments that mounted in the second half of 1776.


    The original content of this program is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Please attribute legal copies of this work to democracynow.org. Some of the work(s) that this program incorporates, however, may be separately licensed. For further information or additional permissions, contact us.

    Non-commercial news needs your support

    We rely on contributions from our viewers and listeners to do our work.
    Please do your part today.

    Make a donation