Modal close

Dear Democracy Now! visitor,

You turn to Democracy Now! for ad-free news you can trust. Maybe you come for our daily headlines. Maybe you come for in-depth stories that expose corporate and government abuses of power. Democracy Now! brings you crucial reporting like our coverage from the front lines of the standoff at Standing Rock or news about the movements fighting for peace, racial and economic justice, immigrant rights and LGBTQ equality. We produce our daily news hour at a fraction of the budget of a commercial news operation—all without ads, government funding or corporate sponsorship. How is this possible? Only with your support. If every visitor to this site in December gave just $10 we could cover our basic operating costs for 2017. Pretty exciting, right? So, if you've been waiting to make your contribution to Democracy Now!, today is your day. It takes just a couple of minutes to make sure that Democracy Now! is there for you and everybody else in 2017.

Non-commercial news needs your support.

We rely on contributions from you, our viewers and listeners to do our work. If you visit us daily or weekly or even just once a month, now is a great time to make your monthly contribution.

Please do your part today.


Snitches and Mandatory Sentencing</B>

StoryJanuary 08, 1999
Watch iconWatch Full Show

In the past five years, nearly one third of defendants in federal drug trafficking cases have received reduced sentences because they cooperated with prosecutors: they snitched. Since the passing of strict federal anti-drug legislation, informants, or snitches, have become key players in drug prosecutions, a practice that was originally intended to help prosecutors catch drug kingpins, but more and more, has yielded opposite results. Snitches can usually only name people who occupy the lower positions in the drug-dealing world, and so our prisons are filled with small-time offenders serving extended sentences. Alarmingly, the word of a snitch is weighed as heavily as physical evidence in court. People can be convicted of drug charges solely on the word of snitches, without any substantiating physical evidence.

Next Tuesday, PBS’ "Frontline" will air a powerful documentary, "Snitch." The film looks at how mandatory minimum sentencing laws, coupled with the use of informants, have given minor offenders harsh sentences on the word of a snitch. Today we talk to the producer of the documentary, as well as people whose lives have been affected by these harsh laws.


  • Ofra Bickell, Producer of the Frontline special "Snitch."
  • Eric Sterling, former counsel to the Chairman of the House Subcommittee on Crime. Author of the Mandatory Minimum Sentencing legislation.
  • Kathleen Krietie, mother of Joey Settembrino, who was sentenced to 10 years in prison under a mandatory drug sentence.
  • Willy Huntley, former prosecutor who now says that the mandatory sentencing laws are flawed and should be revised by Congress.
  • Sally McGee, resident of Uniontown, Alabama. Nine members of her family were convicted on drug charges solely on the word of an informant.

The original content of this program is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Please attribute legal copies of this work to Some of the work(s) that this program incorporates, however, may be separately licensed. For further information or additional permissions, contact us.

Non-commercial news needs your support

We rely on contributions from our viewers and listeners to do our work.
Please do your part today.

Make a donation