Hi there,

Immigration raids are spreading across the country. The agencies meant to protect public health are being dismantled from within. Public broadcasting is being defunded... Today, Democracy Now!'s independent reporting is more important than ever. Because we never accept corporate or government funding, we rely on viewers, listeners and readers like you to sustain our work. Can you start a monthly donation? Monthly donors represent more than 20 percent of our annual revenue. Every dollar makes a difference. Thank you so much.

Democracy Now!
Amy Goodman

Non-commercial news needs your support.

We rely on contributions from you, our viewers and listeners to do our work. If you visit us daily or weekly or even just once a month, now is a great time to make your monthly contribution.

Please do your part today.

Donate

Diallo Judge Issues Rules On Jury Instruction

Listen
Media Options
Listen

The judge presiding over the trial of the four white New York City police officers charged with murdering African immigrant Amadou Diallo said yesterday that he would accept a request by both the defense and the prosecution to add lesser charges to the two counts of second-degree murder each officer faces. The lesser charges include manslaughter in the first and second degree and criminally negligent homicide, the last of which carries a minimum sentence of probation.

The four officers, Sean Caroll, Kenneth Boss, Edward McMellon and Richard McMurphy, killed Diallo in a hail of 41 bullets on February 4, 1999 as he stood in the vestibule of his Bronx apartment building.

Justice Joseph Teresi also said he will present the jury with two statutes from New York penal law when the use of deadly force is justified. One of them says that a police officer is justified in using deadly physical force to defend himself or a third person if he is in the course of making an arrest or preventing escape from custody. The second statute can be applied to civilians, and says that any citizen may use physical force if he “reasonably believes” it is necessary to defend himself from attack.

The judge ruled that the shots fired by the officers must be judged as a collective–meaning that jurors cannot consider each shot fired to be an independent decision by the officers.

Teresi also added that the officers must be judged on the standard of what an “average reasonable person” would do, rather than on what a “reasonable police officer” would do.

Guest:

  • Leslie Brody, head of the New York division of the National Lawyers Guild.

Related Story

StorySep 11, 2025“Moment of Great Peril”: Jeff Sharlet on Killing of Charlie Kirk & Rising Political Violence in U.S.
The original content of this program is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Please attribute legal copies of this work to democracynow.org. Some of the work(s) that this program incorporates, however, may be separately licensed. For further information or additional permissions, contact us.

Non-commercial news needs your support

We rely on contributions from our viewers and listeners to do our work.
Please do your part today.
Make a donation
Top