Modal close

Dear Democracy Now! visitor,

You turn to Democracy Now! for ad-free news you can trust. Maybe you come for our daily headlines. Maybe you come for in-depth stories that expose corporate and government abuses of power. Democracy Now! brings you crucial reporting like our coverage from the front lines of the standoff at Standing Rock or news about the movements fighting for peace, racial and economic justice, immigrant rights and LGBTQ equality. We produce our daily news hour at a fraction of the budget of a commercial news operation—all without ads, government funding or corporate sponsorship. How is this possible? Only with your support. Right now, a generous funder will match your donation dollar for dollar. That means when you give $10 to Democracy Now!, we'll receive $20. So, if you've been waiting to make your contribution to Democracy Now!, today is your day. It takes just a couple of minutes to make sure that Democracy Now! is there for you and everybody else in 2017.

Non-commercial news needs your support.

We rely on contributions from you, our viewers and listeners to do our work. If you visit us daily or weekly or even just once a month, now is a great time to make your monthly contribution.

Please do your part today.

Topics

Bio-Engineered Mouse Virus Takes US Closer to the Ultimate Accident Or Bioweapon

StoryJanuary 24, 2001
Watch iconWatch Full Show

A virus that kills every one of its victims, by wiping out part of their immune system, has been accidentally createdby an Australian research team. The modified mousepox virus does not affect humans, but it is closely related tosmallpox, raising fears that the technology could be used in biowarfare or in unprincipled commercial applications.Critics have long warned that biogenetic research could lead to an accidental or purposeful release of geneticallymodified organisms that, like this virus, have dangerous and unpredictable effects. Now, the technology developed inAustralia gives new reason for fear.

In this case, after internal discussion, the Australian researchers, decided to terminate the project and go public.A lead researcher warned that the process could theoretically be used on almost any virus in existence, but addedthat it could also be put to good use in developing vaccines or understanding the immune system.

But the discovery highlights a series of growing problem: Who decides what research promotes the public good? How doyou stop governments or terrorists from conducting clandestine experiments, or from taking legitimate research andadapting it for their own purposes? And perhaps more routinely, who monitors commercial and military researchconducted behind closed doors or behind the veil of national security?

Guests:

  • Joe Grossman, UPI reporter in California.
  • Annabelle Duncan, Chief of a Division of the Commonwealth Industrial and Scientific Research Organization,Canberra, Australia.
  • Matthew Messelson, Professor of Biology at Harvard University; an advisor to the US government during thebirth of the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention.
  • Andrew Kimbrell, Director of the International Center for Technology Assessment, Washington, DC.

Related link:


The original content of this program is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Please attribute legal copies of this work to democracynow.org. Some of the work(s) that this program incorporates, however, may be separately licensed. For further information or additional permissions, contact us.

Non-commercial news needs your support

We rely on contributions from our viewers and listeners to do our work.
Please do your part today.

Make a donation