Clicky

McLibel

Default content image
Listen
Media Options
Listen

Yesterday, a London judge ruled that part-time bartender Helen Steel and former postal worker David Morris had libeled McDonalds when they handed out a fact sheet seven years ago called "What’s Wrong With McDonald’s?" The pamphlet criticized the food chain’s environmental record and questioned the nutritional value of burger and fries.

But after a three year trial and six months of deliberation, the judge only awarded McDonalds about $185,000 in damages and in many areas agreed with some of the defendants’ criticisms. Joining us today from London to talk about the case is Helen Steel, one of the activists who was sued by McDonald’s. For more information on the Internet visit McSpotlight.

Related Story

Video squareStoryJul 13, 2017Glenn Greenwald: Donald Trump Jr.'s Emails Aren't a "Smoking Gun" or Evidence of Criminal Collusion
The original content of this program is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Please attribute legal copies of this work to democracynow.org. Some of the work(s) that this program incorporates, however, may be separately licensed. For further information or additional permissions, contact us.

Non-commercial news needs your support

We rely on contributions from our viewers and listeners to do our work.
Please do your part today.

Make a donation
Up arrowTop