Clicky

Court Case Reviews 1st Amenfment Claims in Campaign Finance Issue

Default content image
Listen
Media Options
Listen

A Federal appeals court in Cincinnati heard arguments this week from activist attorney’s opposed to the flood of campaign money pouring into local, state and federal elections.

The court will decide whether limits on the amount of money that candidates can spend would violate free speech. The case is an effort to reopen a landmark 1976 US Supreme Court ruling that equated unlimited campaign spending with free speech, a decision that has foiled numerous efforts to reduce the influence of money in politics ever since.

Guest:

  • John Bonifaz, an attorney and the director of the National Voting Rights Institute, a public interest litigation and education organization based in Boston, Massachusetts.

Related links:

.
.
.

Related Story

Video squareStoryJul 17, 2017Outrage Mounts as Saudi Arabia Plans Imminent Executions for 14 Accused Pro-Democracy Protesters
The original content of this program is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Please attribute legal copies of this work to democracynow.org. Some of the work(s) that this program incorporates, however, may be separately licensed. For further information or additional permissions, contact us.

Non-commercial news needs your support

We rely on contributions from our viewers and listeners to do our work.
Please do your part today.

Make a donation
Up arrowTop