You turn to us for voices you won't hear anywhere else.

Sign up for Democracy Now!'s Daily Digest to get our latest headlines and stories delivered to your inbox every day.

Hmos and Lawsuits

Listen
Media Options
Listen

Related

    In the nation’s largest verdict ever against a Health Maintenance Organization (HMO), a California jury this week awarded $120 million to a schoolteacher whose husband fought fruitlessly until his death against Aetna U.S. Health Care of California for coverage of an experimental cancer treatment. The verdict was described by consumer advocates as a clear sign of the public’s anger at HMOs.

    David Goodrich, a San Bernardino County assistant district attorney, died after Aetna delayed treatment for a rare form of cancer for two and a half years. According to attorneys representing Goodrich’s widow, doctors had agreed he needed to be treated outside of the Aetna network, but the company balked. When Goodrich finally decided to seek treatment outside of Aetna, the company refused to pay for it. By then, it was too late to save his life.

    Teresa Goodrich was able to sue Aetna because her husband was a government employee. But for the 40 percent of Americans whose employers pay for health care, a law known as ERISA prevents them from suing HMOs for punitive damages if the companies refuse or delay medical treatment.

    Guests:

    • Jamie Court, from Consumers for Quality Care, a consumer health care advocacy group based in Santa Monica, California.
    • Florence Corcoran, whose baby died of fetal distress after her HMO had her released from the hospital, despite the fact that she was suffering from toxemia and pre-eclampsia, two conditions that can be fatal for mother and baby.
    • Rep. Frank Pallone (D-NJ), Co-Chair of the Democratic Health Care Task Force in the House. He is co-sponsor of the Democratic version of the “Patients Bill of Rights Bill,” which seeks to overturn ERISA, a law that says that consumers cannot sue HMOs.

    Related Story

    StoryMar 22, 2024U.S. Said It Was Calling for a Gaza Ceasefire, But Its U.N. Resolution Didn’t Say That: Phyllis Bennis
    The original content of this program is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Please attribute legal copies of this work to democracynow.org. Some of the work(s) that this program incorporates, however, may be separately licensed. For further information or additional permissions, contact us.

    Non-commercial news needs your support

    We rely on contributions from our viewers and listeners to do our work.
    Please do your part today.
    Make a donation
    Top