Modal close

Dear Democracy Now! visitor,

You turn to Democracy Now! for ad-free news you can trust. Maybe you come for our daily headlines. Maybe you come for in-depth stories that expose corporate and government abuses of power. Democracy Now! brings you crucial reporting like our coverage from the front lines of the standoff at Standing Rock or news about the movements fighting for peace, racial and economic justice, immigrant rights and LGBTQ equality. We produce our daily news hour at a fraction of the budget of a commercial news operation—all without ads, government funding or corporate sponsorship. How is this possible? Only with your support. If every visitor to this site in December gave just $10 we could cover our basic operating costs for 2017. Pretty exciting, right? So, if you've been waiting to make your contribution to Democracy Now!, today is your day. It takes just a couple of minutes to make sure that Democracy Now! is there for you and everybody else in 2017.

Non-commercial news needs your support.

We rely on contributions from you, our viewers and listeners to do our work. If you visit us daily or weekly or even just once a month, now is a great time to make your monthly contribution.

Please do your part today.

Topics

Same-Sex Marriages

StoryDecember 23, 1999
Watch iconWatch Full Show

In a landmark decision reached Monday, the Vermont Supreme Court ruled in favor of three same-sex couples who challenged the constitutionality of Vermont’s marriage laws. The Court concluded in Baker v. State that statutory benefits and protections of marriage must be extended to same-sex couples, and instructed the state legislature to remedy the discrimination.

Now, same-sex couples in Vermont are eligible for a wide variety of protections of laws which recognize the relationship of married partners. For example, partners will be able to inherit from each other without a will, transfer property to each other without paying taxes, and make medical decisions if the other spouse is incapacitated.

Meanwhile, across the country in California, a ballot initiative called Proposition 22-which is sponsored by State Senator Peter Knight-would prevent California from recognizing the marriages of same-sex couples. This would include couples who were married in other states. The Knight Initiative would add the following provision to the California Family Code:

"Only a marriage between a man and a woman shall be valid or recognized."

Well, a study recently released by a Stanford University law professor says that Proposition 22 would have a harmful effect on families and children. Wald concludes that children raised by gay and lesbian couples are as well off as children of heterosexual parents, and that same-sex and opposite-sex partnerships function no differently in terms of stability, commitment and parenting. He also concludes that passage of the initiative would stigmatize same-sex unions, would harm the emotional and economic well-being of the children involved, and would threaten any existing or future benefits of gay and lesbian couples.

Guests:

  • Michael Wald, Jackson Eli Reynolds Professor of Law at Stanford University.
  • Mary Bonauto, civil rights project director for Gay & Lesbian Advocates and Defenders, and co-counsel in Baker v. State.

The original content of this program is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Please attribute legal copies of this work to democracynow.org. Some of the work(s) that this program incorporates, however, may be separately licensed. For further information or additional permissions, contact us.

Non-commercial news needs your support

We rely on contributions from our viewers and listeners to do our work.
Please do your part today.

Make a donation