Modal close

Hi there,

This month Democracy Now! is celebrating our 24th birthday. That's 24 years of hard-hitting news that you know has never been funded by commercial advertisers, corporate underwriters or the government. This is how we protect the editorial independence you rely on. It also means we're counting on you. In honor of our 24th birthday, a generous supporter will DOUBLE every donation to Democracy Now!, meaning your gift can go twice as far. Please do your part. It takes just minutes to make sure that Democracy Now! is there for you and everybody else for another 24 years. Thank you so much!
-Amy Goodman

Non-commercial news needs your support.

We rely on contributions from you, our viewers and listeners to do our work. If you visit us daily or weekly or even just once a month, now is a great time to make your monthly contribution.

Please do your part today.

Donate

U.S. Attack Plans for Iraq Are Modeled On Hiroshima and Nagasaki: A Discussion of “Shock and Awe”

Listen
Media Options
Listen

Shock and Awe. These are the words the Pentagon is using to describe its planned air campaign in Iraq.

Though the invasion has started and bombs are raining down on Baghdad, it appears the shock and awe part of the campaign hasn’t gotten underway.

The idea of “Shock and Awe” is to shatter Iraq “physically, emotionally and psychologically” by raining down on its people at least 300 missiles a day. That would mean that each day, Baghdad would be bombarded by more missiles than were launched during the entire 40 days of the 1991 Gulf War.

In January, when the plan was first leaked, a Pentagon official told the CBS News: “There will not be a safe place in Baghdad.”

The plan was born several years ago, when seven former cold war warriors gathered to rethink US war strategy. The group was co-chaired by Harlan Ullman, a retired navy destroyer commander. In 1996, the group published its findings in a book called “Shock and Awe: Achieving Rapid Dominance.”

Chapter one of the document reads: “Shutting the country down would entail both the physical destruction of appropriate infrastructure and the shutdown and control of the flow of all vital information and associated commerce so rapidly as to achieve a level of national shock akin to the effect that dropping nuclear weapons on Hiroshima and Nagasaki had on the Japanese.”

Yesterday’s Christian Science Monitor reports author and co-chair Harlan Ullman is holding up the US nuclear bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki as a model. He said: “a society that was prepared to die was turned around.”

Independent journalist Russell Mokhiber questions Ari Fleischer in a White House press briefing on Feb. 19th, 2003. He asks how it is possible to protect civilians under the “Shock and Awe” battle plan.

  • Jaime Havenar, independent researcher who wrote the first study of “Shock and Awe.” The report is published on the Not In Our Name website.

Related link:

  • ””:http://www.notinourname.net/Shock_and_Awe.html

Related Story

Video squareStoryMay 17, 2016Chomsky on Obama’s Visit to Hiroshima & Presidential Legacy: “Nothing to Rave About”
The original content of this program is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Please attribute legal copies of this work to democracynow.org. Some of the work(s) that this program incorporates, however, may be separately licensed. For further information or additional permissions, contact us.

Non-commercial news needs your support

We rely on contributions from our viewers and listeners to do our work.
Please do your part today.
Make a donation
Up arrowTop