Hi there,

There has never been a more urgent time for courageous, daily, independent news. Democracy Now!’s independent reporting is more important than ever, when only a galvanized, engaged public, supported by resilient, pro-democracy grassroots movements, can prevent authoritarianism from triumphing. Our TRIPLE MATCH has been EXTENDED through MIDNIGHT EST tonight. That means your $15 gift TODAY will be worth $45. With your contribution, we can continue to go to where the silence is, to bring you the voices of the silenced majority – those calling for peace in a time of war, demanding action on the climate catastrophe and advocating for racial and economic justice. Every dollar makes a difference. Thank you so much!

Democracy Now!
Amy Goodman

Non-commercial news needs your support.

We rely on contributions from you, our viewers and listeners to do our work. If you visit us daily or weekly or even just once a month, now is a great time to make your monthly contribution.

Please do your part today.

Donate

Breaking: Supreme Court Strikes Down Texas Anti-Choice Measures in Victory for Abortion Rights

Web ExclusiveJune 27, 2016
Related

In a 5-3 decision, the Supreme Court has struck down sweeping anti-choice restrictions in Texas, handing down a victory for reproductive rights in the most significant abortion case in a generation.

The provisions at issue in the case required abortion clinics to meet the costly standards of hospital-style surgery centers, and mandated that doctors obtain admitting privileges at a nearby hospital.

The Texas Legislature passed the sweeping anti-choice law in 2013 despite a people’s filibuster and an 11-hour stand by Texas State Senator Wendy Davis. With the law in partial effect, about half of the more than 40 clinics in Texas have closed. If the Supreme Court had allowed the provisions to come into full effect, advocates warned it would have left Texas with about 10 abortion clinics clustered in four metropolitan areas.

But Justices Anthony Kennedy and Stephen Breyer joined all three women on the court, agreeing that the admitting privileges and surgical center requirements constituted an undue burden on people seeking an abortion, and thus violated the Constitution.

In a statement, the lead plaintiff in the case, Amy Hagstrom Miller of Whole Woman’s Health, said, “Every day Whole Woman’s Health treats our patients with compassion, respect and dignity—and today the Supreme Court did the same. We’re thrilled that today justice was served and our clinics stay open.”

Related Story

StoryDec 12, 2023Texas Woman Denied Abortion for Nonviable Fetus, Flees State, “One of Thousands” in Similar Position
The original content of this program is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Please attribute legal copies of this work to democracynow.org. Some of the work(s) that this program incorporates, however, may be separately licensed. For further information or additional permissions, contact us.

Non-commercial news needs your support

We rely on contributions from our viewers and listeners to do our work.
Please do your part today.
Make a donation
Top