Dear Friend,

This year Democracy Now! is celebrating our 25th anniversary—that's 25 years of bringing you fearless, independent reporting. Since our very first broadcast in 1996, Democracy Now! has refused to take government or corporate funding, because nothing is more important to us than our editorial independence. But that means we rely on you, our audience, for support. If everyone who tunes into Democracy Now! signed up for a monthly donation of just $10, we could cover our operating costs for the entire year. Please do your part today. Right now, a generous donor will even DOUBLE your first monthly gift, which means it’ll go twice as far! This is a challenging time for us all, but if you're able to start a new monthly donation, please don’t delay. We’re counting on your support. Thank you and remember, wearing a mask is an act of love.
-Amy Goodman

Non-commercial news needs your support.

We rely on contributions from you, our viewers and listeners to do our work. If you visit us daily or weekly or even just once a month, now is a great time to make your monthly contribution.

Please do your part today.

Donate

Breaking: Supreme Court Strikes Down Texas Anti-Choice Measures in Victory for Abortion Rights

Web ExclusiveJune 27, 2016
Related

In a 5-3 decision, the Supreme Court has struck down sweeping anti-choice restrictions in Texas, handing down a victory for reproductive rights in the most significant abortion case in a generation.

The provisions at issue in the case required abortion clinics to meet the costly standards of hospital-style surgery centers, and mandated that doctors obtain admitting privileges at a nearby hospital.

The Texas Legislature passed the sweeping anti-choice law in 2013 despite a people’s filibuster and an 11-hour stand by Texas State Senator Wendy Davis. With the law in partial effect, about half of the more than 40 clinics in Texas have closed. If the Supreme Court had allowed the provisions to come into full effect, advocates warned it would have left Texas with about 10 abortion clinics clustered in four metropolitan areas.

But Justices Anthony Kennedy and Stephen Breyer joined all three women on the court, agreeing that the admitting privileges and surgical center requirements constituted an undue burden on people seeking an abortion, and thus violated the Constitution.

In a statement, the lead plaintiff in the case, Amy Hagstrom Miller of Whole Woman’s Health, said, “Every day Whole Woman’s Health treats our patients with compassion, respect and dignity—and today the Supreme Court did the same. We’re thrilled that today justice was served and our clinics stay open.”

Related Story

StorySep 02, 2021RIP Roe v. Wade? SCOTUS Won’t Block Texas Abortion Ban That Is “Clearly an Unconstitutional Law”​​
The original content of this program is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Please attribute legal copies of this work to democracynow.org. Some of the work(s) that this program incorporates, however, may be separately licensed. For further information or additional permissions, contact us.

Non-commercial news needs your support

We rely on contributions from our viewers and listeners to do our work.
Please do your part today.
Make a donation
Top