Clicky

Campaign Finance Issues Go to the U.S. Supreme Court

Default content image
Listen
Media Options
Listen

When a political party takes out negative advertising targeting a candidate, should those ads be subject to campaign spending limits? This was the questions before the U.S. Supreme Court yesterday in a case involving in the Republican Party of Colorado versus the Federal Election Commission or FEC, a case which some say puts campaign finance laws at odds with the First Amendment. Groups like Common Cause and Public Citizen filed amicus briefs on behalf of the FEC, while the ACLU both the Republican and Democratic National Committees support the Colorado GOP’s case. Here to explain, and debate this case is Lisa Rosenberg, an attorney with the Center for Responsive Politics FEC Watch Project.

Related Story

Video squareWeb ExclusiveMar 29, 2017Full Interview: Jane Mayer on the Mercers & the Dark Money Behind the Rise of Trump & Bannon
The original content of this program is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Please attribute legal copies of this work to democracynow.org. Some of the work(s) that this program incorporates, however, may be separately licensed. For further information or additional permissions, contact us.

Non-commercial news needs your support

We rely on contributions from our viewers and listeners to do our work.
Please do your part today.

Make a donation
Up arrowTop