Modal close

Dear Democracy Now! visitor,

You turn to Democracy Now! for ad-free news you can trust. Maybe you come for our daily headlines. Maybe you come for in-depth stories that expose corporate and government abuses of power. Democracy Now! brings you crucial reporting like our coverage from the front lines of the standoff at Standing Rock or news about the movements fighting for peace, racial and economic justice, immigrant rights and LGBTQ equality. We produce our daily news hour at a fraction of the budget of a commercial news operation—all without ads, government funding or corporate sponsorship. How is this possible? Only with your support. If every visitor to this site in December gave just $10 we could cover our basic operating costs for 2017. Pretty exciting, right? So, if you've been waiting to make your contribution to Democracy Now!, today is your day. It takes just a couple of minutes to make sure that Democracy Now! is there for you and everybody else in 2017.

Non-commercial news needs your support.

We rely on contributions from you, our viewers and listeners to do our work. If you visit us daily or weekly or even just once a month, now is a great time to make your monthly contribution.

Please do your part today.

Topics

Wen Ho Lee - New York Times Apologizes

StorySeptember 27, 2000
Watch iconWatch Full Show

Yesterday the New York Times went to a place where it has rarely gone before. The Times published an apology of sorts, or at least a public acknowledgment of the paper’s role in the case of Los Alamos National Laboratory scientist Wen Ho Lee.

In March of 1999, the Times published an article by Jeff Gerth and James Risen that suggested that China had accelerated its nuclear program by exploiting massive leaks out of Los Alamos made possible by an un-named Chinese-American scientist. Two days later, Wen Ho Lee was fired from the national weapons laboratory in Los Alamos. Nine months later he was indicted on 59 felony counts, including downloading nuclear secrets onto computer tapes. Lee spent the next nine months shackled, in solitary confinement, forbidden to speak his own language, living in bright light for 24 hours a day in prison.

Earlier this month in a plea bargain, federal prosecutors dropped all counts but one, that of mishandling of secret information, and Lee was released on the condition that he cooperate with the authorities to explain why he downloaded the weapons data and what he did with it. The judge who approved the agreement scathingly rebuked the government’s handling of the case, saying that it had "embarrassed this entire nation and everyone who is a citizen of it."

In a Senate Select Intelligence and Judiciary committee hearing yesterday, Federal Officials had to respond to questions about why the government detained Lee for nine months. Attorney General Janet Reno and FBI Director Louis Freeh defended the government’s case against Wen Ho Lee, saying the prosecution would likely have succeeded if they had gone to trial, but that they plea bargained out of concern for national security–fear of exposing some of the nation’s nuclear secrets.

We asked the New York Times to join us today but they declined.

Guests:

  • Lars Eric Nelson, a reporter for The New York Daily News who has reported extensively on Wen Ho Lee’s Case.
  • Steve Aftergood, with the Federation of American Scientists where he heads the Project on Government Secrecy.

Related links:


The original content of this program is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Please attribute legal copies of this work to democracynow.org. Some of the work(s) that this program incorporates, however, may be separately licensed. For further information or additional permissions, contact us.

Non-commercial news needs your support

We rely on contributions from our viewers and listeners to do our work.
Please do your part today.

Make a donation