Modal close

Hi there,

You turn to Democracy Now! for ad-free daily news you can trust. Maybe you come for our daily headlines, or our in-depth stories that expose corporate and government abuses of power. You need news that isn't being paid for by campaigns or corporations. We produce our daily news hour at a fraction of the budget of a commercial news operation—all without ads, government funding or corporate sponsorship. How? This model of news depends on your support. Right now, every new monthly sustaining donation to Democracy Now! will be tripled by a generous supporter. That means if you can give just $4 a month, Democracy Now! gets $12 today.  Pretty amazing right? If you visit us daily or weekly or even just once a month, start your monthly contribution today. Thanks so much. -Amy Goodman

Non-commercial news needs your support.

We rely on contributions from you, our viewers and listeners to do our work. If you visit us daily or weekly or even just once a month, now is a great time to make your monthly contribution.

Please do your part today.


Human Genome Mapped Opens New Medical Frontier / Ethical Paradox

Default content image
Media Options

This week, two rival teams are publishing their first interpretations of the human genome, the set of DNA-encodedinstructions that specify much about what makes up a person.

The most surprising discovery is that humans have far fewer human genes than anyone thought probably a mere 30,000 orso only a third more than those found in the roundworm.

This preliminary mapping of human genetic code brings scientists closer to finding treatments for genetically linkeddiseases such as Alzheimer’s, certain cancers, diabetes, cardiovascular disease.

But there is also a dark side. Prenatal genetic tests may create a new high tech eugenics by tempting parents to abortfetuses that show a predisposition for certain less desirable physical or mental traits.

Researchers are already combing the world, harvesting genetic material from subjects who neither understand theimplications, nor profit from the results of the use of their genes. Insurance companies and employers are alreadygathering and using genetic information.

Currently, only 25 states bar employers from using genetic information for workplace decisions. In the first federalcase of its kind, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission sued Burlington Northern Railroad. The company requiredgenetic testing for employees who filed claims for a carpal tunnel syndrome and allegedly threatened to fire anemployee who refused to take a blood test. Burlington Northern announced yesterday that it was dropping the testingrequirement.


  • Daniel Kevles, Professor of Humanities in the Science, Ethics and Society department at the CaliforniaInstitute of Technology. He is author of ??In the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity, andco-editor of ??The Code of Codes: Scientific and Social Issues in the Human Genome Project.
  • Jeremy Rifkin, author of ??The Biotech Century: Harnessing the Gene and Remaking the World, andPresident of the Foundation for Economic Trends.
  • Evelyn Fox Keller, Professor of History and the Philosophy of Science at the Massachusetts Institute ofTechnology and author of ??The Century of the Gene.

Related Story

Video squareStorySep 18, 2018Intercept Report Reveals Senate Ignored Federal Court Employees Willing to Testify Against Kavanaugh
The original content of this program is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Please attribute legal copies of this work to Some of the work(s) that this program incorporates, however, may be separately licensed. For further information or additional permissions, contact us.

Non-commercial news needs your support

We rely on contributions from our viewers and listeners to do our work.
Please do your part today.
Make a donation
Up arrowTop