Hi there,

If you think Democracy Now!’s reporting is a critical line of defense against war, climate catastrophe and authoritarianism, please make your donation of $10 or more right now. Today, a generous donor will TRIPLE your donation, which means it’ll go 3x as far to support our independent journalism. Democracy Now! is funded by you, and that’s why we’re counting on your donation to keep us going strong. Please give today. Every dollar makes a difference—in fact, gets tripled! Thank you so much.
-Amy Goodman

Non-commercial news needs your support.

We rely on contributions from you, our viewers and listeners to do our work. If you visit us daily or weekly or even just once a month, now is a great time to make your monthly contribution.

Please do your part today.

Donate

Powell Admits Unlikely WMD Will Be Found in Iraq

HeadlineSep 14, 2004

Secretary of State Colin Powell, who made the case to the world that pre-war Iraq had stocks of chemical and biological weapons, said on Monday he now thought WMDs will probably never be found. He told lawmakers, “I think it’s unlikely that we will find any stockpiles,”

Powell was responding to questions about the intelligence behind his Feb. 5, 2003, U.N. Security Council speech laying out U.S. arguments for the invasion of Iraq that began six weeks later. Powell’s latest comments appear to be his most explicit to date suggesting that the central argument for President Bush’s decision to invade Iraq was false. On Sunday on NBC’s Meet the Press, Powell said he had seen “nothing that makes a direct connection between Saddam Hussein and the 9-11 attacks. Asked how he believes Sen. John Kerry would respond to a terrorist attack, Powell said, “I can’t tell you how he might respond to it. As commander in chief, I think he’d respond to it in a robust way.” NBC’s Tim Russert, using language similar to a question President Bush had posed about Kerry regarding the former Iraqi leader, asked Powell if he “knew today that Saddam did not have these weapons of mass destruction, would you still advocate an invasion?”

Powell did not answer directly, but said, “I would have to look at the total picture, and we’d have to sit down and talk about his intention to have such weapons.”

The original content of this program is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Please attribute legal copies of this work to democracynow.org. Some of the work(s) that this program incorporates, however, may be separately licensed. For further information or additional permissions, contact us.

Non-commercial news needs your support

We rely on contributions from our viewers and listeners to do our work.
Please do your part today.
Make a donation
Top